Google Reader adds comments for sharing

March 12th, 2009 •
Tags: comment, comments, conversation, friendfeed, google reader, sharing, Social Web

This is a big deal for social web addicts. One of the first articles posted to this site was about the inadequacies of Google Reader as a sharing platform when compared to FriendFeed. Yesterday, one of FriendFeed‘s advantages over Google’s sharing platform was mitigated as Google unveiled comments for shared items. Google Reader makes it easy to share stories with friends, but it hasn’t fostered conversation around shared content. The best you could do is to either e-mail the sharer or re-share the item with a note containing your own comments. This new feature is a real breakthrough, and it’s something I know for a fact I will use every day. Now, if Google will only copy Gmail’s new label management system right on over to Google Reader…

Tumblr vs. Posterous: microblogging throwdown

February 22nd, 2009 • 17 comments
Tags: Blog, blogging, microblogging, Posterous, tumblr

I’ve been auditioning the two heavyweights in the greater-than-140-characters microblogging space for a bit over a week now. I can tell you right off the bat, there is no clear winner here. Both services certainly have a place. In fact, the services are not quite as similar as I first thought.

Registration is an easy win for Posterous. It is one of few services that do not require a registration form to begin. Instead, just e-mail post [at] posterous [dot] com. Tumblr’s registration isn’t terrible, but you can’t beat no registration.

It was easily apparent that Tumblr (read my post about it) is the more full-featured of the two. It is truly just a half-step below a full-featured blog. There are multiple media types that can be easily added to your tumblelog. Posterous (read my post on that one too) takes a more hands-off approach to media. If you make a post with a link to a video on YouTube or a host of other media hosting sites, the media will automatically be embedded, but no attempt is made to facilitate your actually adding a video or audio file yourself unless you have first uploaded it to one of the aforementioned services. Tumblr, on the other hand, will send you to Vimeo when you want to post a video then add it to your blog. Audio hosting appears to be done in-house at Tumblr.

Both services offer a bookmarklet for easily sharing content without interrupting your surfing. There was at least one page that would not share with the Tumblr bookmarklet for some reason. I never really understood why that was. It seemed to share fine with Posterous. The bookmarklets are slightly different: Tumblr’s opens a new window/tab where Posterous overlays on top of the current page. I didn’t really see that make much difference. I’m sure some people would prefer one or the other, but it is purely cosmetic.

Both services also offer posting via e-mail. Posterous is intelligent in handling your e-mails. As I stated before, it will automatically embed media if you send e-mail with a link to said media. It seems Tumblr posts any link you send as just a link which is a bit of a bummer. You can, of course, still post a video through the web interface, but it would be nice to see e-mail posts handled based on context. Also, the Posterous address is a no-brainer: post [at] posterous [dot] com. Tumblr generates an e-mail address for each user. This means, you will probably not be recalling your e-mail for Tumblr if you happen to be away from your contact list.

The web interface is not the focus of the Posterous service. They really expect you to post everything via e-mail. It is still serviceable though. You get a WYSIWYG text editor, and, just like sending an e-mail, it will intelligently decide how to handle links. Even though Posterous doesn’t show you dedicated options for posting media, that functionality is present and works beautifully and simply. At Tumblr, you will select a type of post which will determine how your data is displayed. It has all the goodies as well. It’s nice to be able to explicitly specify what you are trying to post. If you were to post a link to a video site Posterous does not support, it is unclear how that would be handled. Since you would have already specified in Tumblr that you intend to post video, it makes sense that you would receive an error if Tumblr cannot find video at the given location.

If you need customization, you should really just forget about Posterous as there isn’t any to speak of. Tumblr has a really wide-range of options here. If this is going to be your only blog and you want to express yourself, Tumblr is the way to go.

Tumblr has added a new feature since I wrote about them that is very interesting. Users can now call a 1-800 number to post audio from their phones on the go. This is really cool, but I’m not sure exactly how I would use it.

As I said in the opening, neither service dominates the other. My advice: if this is your only blog or you really need to be able to customize, go with Tumblr. It’s easy, offers a lot of features, and completely flexible as far as styling. If you’re looking for a service to supplement other services in the social media space, stick to Posterous. It’s quick to setup, you don’t even have to think about design or customization, and you can basically use e-mail for all your posting be it text or multimedia. I’m personally going with Posterous. I’m already well-represented on the social web so I don’t need a microblogging service to reflect myself in any aspect other than the content. Posterous really dispenses with all the frills and lets me focus on just that.

Once again I want to mention that, should you decide to start using one of these services, you should totally add me. We could be friends and stuff. I will probably use my Posterous for most things, but I’m keeping my tumblelog around just to see if I can find a use for the über-cool audio posting via phone feature. If you’d prefer to follow both via RSS, I made a pipe for that which will try to eliminate any duplicate posts.  See you on the Interwebs!

The Facebook TOS controversy

February 19th, 2009 •
Tags: Facebook, Mark Zuckerman

Facebook recently updated their terms of service to include language which made users of the service a little uncomfortable. The new terms gave Facebook “perpetual worldwide license” to any content shared on the service. There was an outcry from the community regarding the open-endedness of these new terms of service. I can attest that, upon sharing content on any social network, my intent is not to relinquish ownership of that content but to expose it to a different audience. Most users agreed with me leaving Facebook with a multitude of disenchanted users.

As such, Facebook had to respond. Founder Mark Zuckerberg issued a statement about the new terms. This statement basically said they would never actually use all the rights granted to them by the new TOS. Their intent was only to be able to continue displaying content that had been sent to friends even after a user leaves Facebook so as not to upset the continuity of the friend’s experience. In fact, Facebook claims the terms do not allow them to use your content in any way they wish. I’m certainly no lawyer, but I have trouble seeing the limits of a “perpetual worldwide license.” I can understand the desire to allow friends to continue accessing content even if the contributor has left the community. It would be jarring if messages and shared items were to disappear as friends leave. However, I think Facebook’s approach is a bit of overkill. It seems to me they could have reserved their rights to continue displaying user content in the way that user intended even after departing by merely adding that these were in fact the rights they had to the content rather than the blanket statement that actually ended up in the terms.

Luckily, your voices did not go unheard. Facebook launched a poll to gauge user response to the new terms. Fifty-six percent of users preferred the old TOS, and alas it was restored. The new terms would have granted Facebook too much in the way of rights to user content. However, the deft response to users’ concerns is encouraging for a company so large. Certainly, Facebook could have maintained the new TOS and probably suffered very little as a result. Online communities have come to realize that their most vocal users are the hardest to please but are also their greatest assets. They are often the first and loudest to complain, but they are also the most frequent contributors to the ongoing conversation amongst users that is the sole reason these services can exist. I, for one, applaud Facebook for listening to user concerns and responding. As a content creator myself, I understand that if I give up rights to my content online, I have nothing.

Jinni invites for your favorite movie

February 14th, 2009 • 5 comments
Tags: film, invites, jinni, movies, recommendations, suggestions

Jinni is a really cool movie suggestion engine. It has developed a movie “genome” that defines certain traits in movies in much the same way Pandora does for music. I have five Jinni invites for the first five commenters who post their favorite movies. Go to it!

Posterous: minimalistic microblogging and sharing

February 13th, 2009 • 2 comments
Tags: Blog, microblogging, Posterous, tumblr

Ready to start a microblog at Posterous? OK. Send an e-mail to post [at] posterous [dot] com. Now you’re done! They will reply with your Posterous URL, and your blog setup is complete. Of course, you can go to the site and flesh out your profile, but the initial setup is done without a single form to fill out or password to create. Most anyone who uses the Internet is familiar with e-mail making Posterous the every-man blogging platform.

Being a power user (not to mention a control freak), I created my Posterous account on the site in the more traditional way of registering for web services. I did so because was unsure how the e-mail account creation would determind what URL to designate for my blog. I registered raddevon.posterous.com, got my confirmation e-mail, and started composing a quick post in Gmail. I sent the post in and received a reply asking me to click a link to confirm my address and post. I did so, but the post never showed up on raddevon.posterous.com. After noticing that my profile page still said my e-mail was not confirmed, I realized I had created a new blog by e-mailing a post before confirming my address. Sure enough, I had overlooked a confirmation link in the original e-mail I got after registering on the site.

At this point, I was prepared that I might have to recompose my post as the old one was on the other blog which was created, but, after I confirmed the address, my posts were moved over to raddevon.posterous.com! I am very impressed that the service knew I would probably want the posts on the blog I registered via the site. If you plan to use the easy e-mail method to create your blog (or even if you plan to read the registration e-mail after your web registration), you probably won’t run into this issue.

Posterous takes the minimalist philosophy to its logical end. You don’t design and tweak your Posterous page. You have the option to write a bio and upload a profile picture, but that is it. The Myspace crowd may not like the inability to customize and personalize, but the Facebook crowd will appreciate the simplicity. Every Posterous blog looks the same so you can really concentrate on making posts rather than tweaking designs.

E-mail posting is also very minimalistic. Posterous doesn’t parse any HTML in your e-mail posts. Instead, that all gets put right into the post verbatim. It will automatically link URLs even if you don’t include the protocol (i.e. raddevon.com as opposed to http://raddevon.com/; both will be linked automatically). You can, however, edit existing posts or make new ones from a web interface at the Posterous site which gives you access to a slick WYSIWYG post editor that allows for linking words and some basic text formatting.

When I first register for a service, I have trouble discerning if it’s really a cool service or I’m just enamoured with the newness of it. Right now, I’m really excited about both Posterous and tumblr. I will continue to use the services at least for a little while so that I can write a proper comparison of the two. If you’re interested in seeing the comparison, subscribe to the blog so you will get it as soon as it’s posted!

Tumblr: more than a Tweet, less than a blog post

February 12th, 2009 •
Tags: Blog, microblogging, sharing, Social Web, Tumblelog, tumblr, twitter

Occasionally, I would like to post a quick thought or idea, but I can’t really fit it into Twitter’s 140 characters. It also doesn’t justify the trouble of making a blog post or it otherwise doesn’t really fit there. Tumblr is a microblogging service that may fill the gap between a tweet and a full-fledged blog post.

The service has been around for a while, and I have heard of it before. It just didn’t entice me to try it. Now that I’m signed up and have my tumblelog setup, I’m really liking it’s unique featureset. It has support for a number of different post types which will embed content directly into your posts. Instead of having to link to every piece of media you’d like to share, you can embed them directly into your tumblelog.

E-mail posting is supported. Once you register at Tumblr, you are given a unique e-mail address for posting directly to your tumblelog. This e-mail address can even be used to post media including photos, MP3s, and videos. Add this e-mail to your mobile device to allow for posting on the go.

Users have a lot of flexibility in the design of their tumblelogs. There are a number of themes provided, and users may also write custom HTML and CSS to style the blog themselves.

The service is very accessible. It’s easy for users to get up and running with a quick blog, and this may be a viable platform for your blog if you don’t need a robust blogging engine. It also offers a few power features like the aforementioned custom CSS, the ability to import your own blog and/or RSS feeds, and the ability to embed the tumblelog elsewhere on the web.

For someone like me who already blogs, tumblr might be a good place for posting unrelated things or stuff that doesn’t warrant a full post, but only time will tell if it will become a part of my daily workflow. I plan to give this and another similar service, Posterous, some airtime to see if they are services I want to use regularly. Check back tomorrow for a quick overview of Posterous. After I have had an opportunity to try both of the services a bit, I will post a comparison of the two services.

If you are on tumblr, please follow me. I would also love to see comments from anyone who has used both of the services on which they prefer and why. If you use only tumblr, post a comment telling how you use it and how it fits in with the rest of the social web services you use on a regular basis.

Read Digg’s top stories? Subscribe to Feeddit

February 11th, 2009 • 2 comments
Tags: digg, Feeddit, feeds, Internet, News, rss, social news, Tech

Lost In Technology has written a post on a feed I have been using for a while now called Feeddit. I like to track the top stories on Digg. However, Digg’s RSS feed is really a mess if you ask me. The biggest problem: each story’s link tag goes to the Digg page rather than that story. So, here’s the scenario. I’m surfing along through my feeds with Google Reader (check out my video tutorial). I see a Digg post I want to read. I press the ‘v’ key to open the story. This opens a new tab with the Digg page for the story. I click the title of the story, and only now do I get yet another tab to read the actual story. This may not really sound like a big deal, but when you’re staring at an unread count of 1000+ (the highest count that registers on Google Reader) knowing that a good chunk of those are Digg stories, you want to burn through them pretty quickly so that you can filter out the good stuff from the crap. Those extra clicks, page loads, and tab closings really slow the process to a crawl.

Feeddit provides a remedy to this problem and them some. The feed item’s link is now directed to the actual story. Hurray! In addition, the poster’s name is included underneath the title of the story. The Digg count is included under the summary along with the comment count. Both of these link to the Digg page for the story making it easy to participate on Digg without shoving it down your throat every single story. I always want to view the article before I comment or digg it. Feeddit gives me a feed that makes sense for that workflow.

Now, where is the reddit analog to this?

Feeddit Powers Up The Default Digg Feed

Use Backtype to track your and your friends’ comments online

February 7th, 2009 •
Tags: backtype, blogs, commenting, comments, social networking, weblogs

For those of you who are active commenting on lots of blogs, Backtype is a wonderful service that tracks your commenting. Register an account and claim your comments on blogs and a number of other social sites. Backtype itself is a social network around your comments and the comments of friends. Follow people and have them follow you, and, when comments are posted by people you follow, you see it on your Backtype page.

You may know that WordPress blogs ask for your website URL. This is what Backtype uses to attach your comments to your profile. Tell Backtype any of the URLs you use when commenting. It will look at the indexed comments to find comments that are posted with your URLs which will then be attributed to you. If someone else starts posting with one of your URLs, you can mark them as “Fake” to remove the comments from your page. Comments on other services are a little more straightforward. You enter your username so there isn’t much guesswork to be done in attributing your comments.

A fantastic secondary feature is comment subscription. Some blogs (this one included) provide a means for users to subscribe to comments via e-mail. Unfortunately, many do not. Rather than depending on the blog owner to set this up, Backtype allows users to subscribe to any comments thread via bookmarklet.

Before the launch of this service, it was difficult to track this aspect of friends’ activity online. Now, all your comments can be shared and accessed as you wish. It makes it much easier to become involved in the discussions online your friends value. Online comments are, for the most part, very encapsulated and disconnected. Backtype unifies comments and makes them a part of the social online experience. It reorganizes comments around individuals rather than around the content that inspires them.

If you decide to try Backtype, follow me on the service. Also, if you like this post, subscribe to raddevon.com!

Receive all your Twitter @replies via SMS

February 3rd, 2009 • 5 comments
Tags: @replies, @reply, iPhone, Short message service, sms, text message, Text messaging, tweets, twitter

Twitter‘s mobile updates text message you with tweets for your selected followers. It will also text message you with any direct messages you receive. Unfortunately, @replies are left out in the cold. Using the magic of Twitter Search, Yahoo Pipes, and Yahoo Alerts, you can begin to receive all @replies directed to you on your cell phone!

Enter your Twitter username into my Twitter @replies pipe

Right-click “Get as RSS” and click “Copy Link Location”

Go to Yahoo Alerts. If you haven’t already setup the service, you will need to configure it now. Be sure you setup your mobile phone to receive alerts.

In the “Create an Alert” tab, click “Feed/Blog”

Paste the URL we copied earlier into the box labeled ‘A’

Check the box for mobile alerts at the bottom and be sure your phone is selected

Click “Save Alert”

You will now receive all your @replies via text message on your phone. Enjoy!

SocialWhois gives a deeper look at Twitterers/FriendFeeders

February 3rd, 2009 •
Tags: friendfeed, Online Communities, profiles, Social network, social networking, Social Web, SocialWhois, twitter

Mashable pointed out this new site with a great concept. Both FriendFeed and Twitter have incredibly minimalistic profiles—FriendFeed having none to speak of and Twitter offering only a short bio. SocialWhois allows users to look up potential follows to learn more about them. This information depends partly on the user having created a profile with the service, but, for FriendFeed users, SocialWhois will “guess” at a profile by pulling in all the services a user has linked from the FriendFeed account. This still gives you quite a lot of information but no more than you might get looking at the user’s FriendFeed profile yourself.

This is another one of those services that will depend on having a critical mass of users before it actually becomes useful. It definitely fills a need in the social web space—one that some social networks do a better job of recognizing than others. It is really difficult to get a feel for a person by looking only at their Twitter bio and latest tweets, and FriendFeed could use a brief bio for each user. SocialWhois provides all that, but its utility is currently hampered by a small userbase. If it is able to expand that userbase significantly, it will be very helpful in determining whether or not to follow back that latest follower.